1.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, Kroworsch S, Sherrier A, Wittkopp S, et al. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
2.
Rudolf B, Freeman MA, Chinkin CM. The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
3.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish; 2005.
4.
Ross SD. Women’s human rights: the international and comparative law casebook. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2008.
5.
Cook RJ. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1994.
6.
Cook RJ, ebrary, Inc. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives [Internet]. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1994. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10576124
7.
Charlesworth H, Chinkin CM. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2000.
8.
Cook RJ, Cusack S, ebrary, Inc. Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives [Internet]. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2010. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10642665
9.
Cook RJ, Cusack S. Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives. Vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2010.
10.
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright. Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1991;85(4):613–45. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2203269?sid=21105586542853&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4
11.
Charlesworth H, Chinkin CM. Chapters 1, 2 & 5. In: The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2000.
12.
Charlesworth, Hilary. Not Waving but Drowning: Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations. Harvard human rights journal [Internet]. 2005;18. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hhrj18&id=7&collection=journals&index=
13.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Engaged Scholarship as Method and Vocation. Yale journal of law and feminism [Internet]. 2010;22. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjfem22&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults&terms=C.|MacKinnon|Engaged|Scholarship|as|a|Method|and|Vocation&type=matchall
14.
Coomarswaamy R. Reinventing International Law [Internet]. Available from: http://library.law.columbia.edu/urlmirror/11/ReinventingInternationalLaw.htm
15.
Fraser AS. Becoming Human: The Origins and Development of Women’s Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 1999;21(4):853–906. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v021/21.4fraser.html
16.
Charlesworth, Hilary. Hidden Gender of International Law, The. Temple international and comparative law journal [Internet]. 2002;16. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tclj16&id=99&collection=journals&index=
17.
Teson, Fernando R. Feminism and International Law: A Reply. Virginia journal of international law [Internet]. 1992;33. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint33&div=34&g_sent=1&collection=journals
18.
Airey v Ireland 32 Eur Ct HR Ser A (1979): [1979] 2 E.H.R.R. 305 | ESCR-Net [Internet]. Available from: http://www.escr-net.org/docs/i/400936
19.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of González et al. ("Cotton Field”) v. Mexico Judgment of November 16, 2009 (Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations, and Costs) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_205_ing.pdf
20.
Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights and Interights v Egypt 323/2006, 14 March 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://eipr.org/sites/default/files/pressreleases/pdf/text_of_the_afriocan_commission_decision-english.pdf
21.
González Carreño v. Spain, CEDAW Communication CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012&Lang=en
22.
Optional Protocol CEDAW [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPCEDAW.aspx
23.
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Vienna.aspx
24.
UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund | International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unfpa.org/publications/international-conference-population-and-development-programme-action
25.
Fourth World Conference on Women, Declaration and Program for Action, 15 September 1995, UN Doc A/CONF.177/20/Rev.1 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/
26.
Human Rights Committee General Comment No 24 on Reservations, date 24th November 1994 [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.6&Lang=en
27.
General Comment No. 28 - Article 3 (The equality of rights between men and women) [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.10&Lang=en
28.
Human Rights Committee General Comment No. 31 [80] Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.13&Lang=en
29.
Platform for Action and the Declaration from Beijing + 10, [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw49/documents.html
30.
UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund. ICPC and human rights :20 years of advancing reproductive rights through UN treaty bodies and legal reform [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unfpa.org/publications/icpd-and-human-rights
31.
Recurrent and themes and key elements identified during sessions of the Commission on Population and Development: Report of the Secretary-General. UN Doc A/69/122, 15 July 2014 [Internet]. Available from: http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1420L9R462P54.2775&profile=bib&uri=link=3100006~!1325851~!3100001~!3100040&aspect=alpha&menu=search&ri=2&source=~!horizon&term=A%2F69%2F122&index=ZUNSYMA#focus
32.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, Kroworsch S, Sherrier A, Wittkopp S, et al. Pages 8-70 and pages 607-659. In: The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
33.
Rudolf B, Freeman MA, Chinkin CM. Pages 8-70 and pages 607-659 . In: The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
34.
Charlesworth H, Chinkin CM. Chapters 6 and 7. In: The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2000.
35.
Evatt, Elizabeth. Finding a Voice for Women’s Rights: The Early Days of CEDAW. George Washington International Law Review [Internet]. 2002;34. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gwilr34&div=23&g_sent=1&collection=journals
36.
Women, Peace and Security. United Nations Security Council Resolutions, 1325, 1820, 1888, 1960, 2106, 2122 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/issues/women/wps.shtml
37.
Aoláin FN. Women, Security, and the Patriarchy of Internationalized Transitional Justice. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. 2009;31(4):1055–85. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v031/31.4.aolain.html
38.
Bell C, O’Rourke C. PEACE AGREEMENTS OR PIECES OF PAPER? THE IMPACT OF UNSC RESOLUTION 1325 ON PEACE PROCESSES AND THEIR AGREEMENTS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2010 Oct;59(04):941–80. Available from: https://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7923398&fileId=S002058931000062X
39.
Heathcote G. Naming and Shaming: Human Rights Accountability in Security Council Resolution 1960 (2010) on Women, Peace and Security. Journal of Human Rights Practice [Internet]. 2012 Mar 1;4(1):82–105. Available from: https://jhrp.oxfordjournals.org/content/4/1/82.short
40.
Rape in armed conflict summit: [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/william-hague-and-angelina-jolie-demand-end-to-impunity-for-warzone-rape
41.
Focus on pages 10-16 skim read the rest. In: International Protocol on the documentation and investigation of sexual violence in conflict [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/319054/PSVI_protocol_web.pdf
42.
Rape summit in London sparks charge of ‘hypocrisy’ | Global development | The Guardian [Internet]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jun/07/end-sexual-violence-summit-uk-government-hypocrisy
43.
United Nations C on E Social and Cultural Rights. General comment No. 16: The equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights (art. 3 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f2005%2f4&Lang=en
44.
UNDP. The future we want : rights and empowerment. Gender equality strategy 2014-2017 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/gender/GenderEqualityStrategy2014-17.pdf
45.
Outcome Document of Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals, 19 July 2014, [Internet]. Available from: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?menu=1528
46.
Doughnut | Kate Raworth Explore for another approach to integrating human rights in a contemporary and forward-looking development paradigm. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.kateraworth.com/doughnut/
47.
UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund. ICPC and human rights :20 years of advancing reproductive rights through UN treaty bodies and legal reform [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unfpa.org/publications/icpd-and-human-rights
48.
Recurrent and themes and key elements identified during sessions of the Commission on Population and Development: Report of the Secretary-General. UN Doc A/69/122, 15 July 2014 [Internet]. Available from: http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1420L9R462P54.2775&profile=bib&uri=link=3100006~!1325851~!3100001~!3100040&aspect=alpha&menu=search&ri=2&source=~!horizon&term=A%2F69%2F122&index=ZUNSYMA#focus
49.
General Comment No. 28 - Article 3 (The equality of rights between men and women) [Internet]. Available from: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.10&Lang=en
50.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, Kroworsch S, Sherrier A, Wittkopp S, et al. Pages 71-121 and 197-221. In: The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
51.
Rudolf B, Freeman MA, Chinkin CM. Pages 71-121 and 197-221. In: The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
52.
Cook RJ, Cusack S. Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 6. In: Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2010.
53.
Cook RJ, Cusack S, ebrary, Inc. Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 6 . In: Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives [Internet]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2010. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10642665
54.
Aileen McColgan. Principles of equality and protection from discrimination in international human rights law. European Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2003;(2). Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IB6A64D21E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp0.essex.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth+
55.
Joseph S, Castan M. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: cases, materials, and commentary. 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
56.
Mahoney K. Canadian Approaches to Equality Rights and Gender Equity in the Courts. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives [Internet]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1994. Available from: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10576124
57.
Mahoney K. Canadian Approaches to Equality Rights and Gender Equity in the Courts. In: Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1994.
58.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, Supreme Court of Canada, Judgement of 2nd Feb 1989. In: Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish; 2005.
59.
Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143, 1989 CanLII 2 (SCC) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1989/1989canlii2/1989canlii2.html
60.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. Brooks and others v Canada Safeway Limited, Supreme Court of Canada, Judgement of 4th May 1989. In: Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish; 2005.
61.
Brooks v. Canada safeway ltd., [1989] 1 SCR 1219, 1989 CanLII 96 (SCC) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1989/1989canlii96/1989canlii96.html
62.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. H v E, Equal Opportunities Tribunal, New Zealand. In: Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish; 2005.
63.
Student Representative Council of Molepolole College of Education v Attorney General - [1995] 3 LRC 447. Available from: https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-8V31-DYJ0-822W&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
64.
Lovelace v Canada decision of the UN Human Rights Committee [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/undocs/session36/6-24.htm
65.
A. P. Johannes Vos v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 786/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/66/D/786/1997 (29 July 1999). [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/undocs/session66/view786.htm
66.
CASE OF WESSELS-BERGERVOET v. THE NETHERLANDS [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-60493
67.
ROCHES v WADE | Commonwealth and International Law Document | INTERIGHTS [Internet]. Available from: http://www.interights.org/commonwealth-and-international-law-document/3047/index.html
68.
Lesotho: Ts’epe v The Independent Electoral Commission and Others (2005) AHRLR 136 (LeCA 2005) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.chr.up.ac.za/index.php/browse-by-subject/343-lesotho-tsepe-v-the-independent-electoral-commission-and-others-2005-ahrlr-136-leca-2005-.pdf
69.
Commission E. Strategy for equality between women and men 2010-2015 COM(2010) 491 final [Internet]. Available from: http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Strategy-for-equality-between-women-and-men-European-Commision.pdf
70.
Inter- American Court Of Human Rights Case Of Atala Riffo And Daughters V. Chile (Merits, reparation and costs) [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_239_ing.pdf
71.
Rudolf B, Freeman MA, Chinkin CM. The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
72.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, Kroworsch S, Sherrier A, Wittkopp S, et al. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
73.
Magaya v Magaya [1999] ICHRL 14 (16 February 1999) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.worldlii.org/int/cases/ICHRL/1999/14.html
74.
Bhe and Others v The Magistrate, Khayelitsha and Others, Constitutional Court of South Africa, Decision of 15th October 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2004/17media.pdf
75.
Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa (CCT 03/07) [2008] ZACC 9; 2008 (9) BCLR 914 (CC); 2009 (2) SA 66 (CC) (4 June 2008) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2008/9.html
76.
Aumeeruddy v Mauritius, decision of the UN Human Rights Committee. Human rights law journal. 1981;2.
77.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. Mohammed Ahmed Khan v Shah Bano, Supreme Court of India [1985]. London: Cavendish; 2005.
78.
Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors on 23 April, 1985 [Internet]. Available from: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/823221/
79.
CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57416
80.
CASE OF ÜNAL TEKELI v. TURKEY [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-67482
81.
Hadijatou Mani v Niger | INTERIGHTS [Internet]. Available from: http://www.interights.org/niger-slavery/index.html
82.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, Kroworsch S, Sherrier A, Wittkopp S, et al. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
83.
Rudolf B, Freeman MA, Chinkin CM. The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
84.
Rubio-Marâin R. The gender of reparations: unsettling sexual hierarchies while redressing human rights violations. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
85.
Rubio-Marâin R, EBSCOhost ebook collection. The gender of reparations: unsettling sexual hierarchies while redressing human rights violations [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=286494
86.
Rubio-Marâin R, EBSCOhost ebook collection. The gender of reparations: unsettling sexual hierarchies while redressing human rights violations [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=286494
87.
Vesa, Andreea. International and Regional Standards for Protecting Victims of Domestic Violence. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law [Internet]. 2004;12. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajgsp12&id=317
88.
Burton, Mandy. Human Rights of Victims of Domestic Violence: Opuz v Turkey, The. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2010;22. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq22&id=133
89.
Hasselbacher, Lee. State Obligations regarding Domestic Violence: The European Court of Human Rights, Due Diligence, and International Legal Minimums of Protection. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights [Internet]. 2009;8. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jihr8&id=191
90.
Edwards, Alice. Violence against Women as Sex Discrimination: Judging the Jurisprudence of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Texas Journal of Women and the Law [Internet]. 2008;18. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tjwl18&g_sent=1&id=3
91.
Simmons, William Paul. Remedies for the Women of Cuidad Juarez through the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights [Internet]. 2005;4. Available from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jihr4&g_sent=1&id=499
92.
Banda F, EBSCOhost ebook collection. Women, law and human rights: an African perspective [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2005. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=216333
93.
Banda F, dawsonera. Women, law and human rights: an African perspective [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2005. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847311832
94.
Banda F. Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart; 2005.
95.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras Judgment of July 29, 1988 (Merits) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_04_ing.pdf
96.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. R v R (Rape; Marital Exemption) decision of the House of Lords, 23rd October 1991. In: Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish; 2005.
97.
R v R [1990] UKHL 9 (23 October 1991) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1990/9.html
98.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. Mejia v Peru, Decision of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights. In: Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish; 2005.
99.
Mejia v Peru, Decision of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights REPORT No 5/96 CASE 10.970 PERU March 1, 1996 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/95eng/Peru10970.htm
100.
Emerton R, Commonwealth Secretariat, University of Hong Kong. Fernandes v Brazil, Decision of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights, 16th April 2001. In: Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish; 2005.
101.
MARIA DA PENHA MAIA FERNANDES V BRAZIL REPORT No 54/01* CASE 12.051 April 16, 2001 [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/54-01.html
102.
CEDAW. AT v Hungary Communication No.: 2/2003 (Views adopted on 26 January 2005, thirty-second session [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/protocol/decisions-views/CEDAW%20Decision%20on%20AT%20vs%20Hungary%20English.pdf
103.
CASE OF OPUZ v. TURKEY (Application no. 33401/02) [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-92945
104.
Opuz v Turkey Brief | Legal Resource | INTERIGHTS [Internet]. Available from: http://www.interights.org/document/124/index.html
105.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of González et al.("Cotton Field”) v.Mexico Judgment of November 16, 2009 (Preliminary Objection, Merits , Reparations, and Costs) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_205_ing.pdf
106.
Petition 1490-05 - Jessica Gonzales et al. v United States [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/2007eng/USA1490.05eng.htm
107.
CASE OF X AND Y v. THE NETHERLANDS (Application no. 8978/80) [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57603
108.
CASE OF M.C. v. BULGARIA (Application no. 39272/98) [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61521
109.
CASE OF AYDIN v. TURKEY (57/1996/676/866) [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-58371
110.
Rosendo Cantu et al vs Mexico [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_216_ing.pdf
111.
Grewal K. The Protection of Sexual Autonomy under International Criminal Law: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Defining Rape. Journal of International Criminal Justice [Internet]. 2012 May 1;10(2):373–96. Available from: https://jicj.oxfordjournals.org/content/10/2/373
112.
WHO | Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women [Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241548595/en/
113.
How To Guide For Interviewing Survivors of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence - WITNESS BlogWITNESS Blog [Internet]. Available from: http://blog.witness.org/2013/08/new-how-to-guide-for-interviewing-survivors-of-sexual-and-gender-based-violence/
114.
WHO | WHO ethical and safety recommendations for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies [Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241595681/en/
115.
McCrum S, Hughes L. Interviewing children a guide for journalists and others (Save the Children) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/INTERVIEWING_CHILDREN.pdf
116.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, Kroworsch S, Sherrier A, Wittkopp S, et al. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
117.
Rudolf B, Freeman MA, Chinkin CM. The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
118.
Banda F. Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart; 2005.
119.
Banda F, dawsonera. Women, law and human rights: an African perspective [Internet]. Oxford: Hart; 2005. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847311832
120.
Banda F, EBSCOhost ebook collection. Women, law and human rights: an African perspective [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2005. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=216333
121.
Shaw D, Cook RJ. Applying human rights to improve access to reproductive health services. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2012;119:S55–9.
122.
WHO. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems [Internet]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70914/1/9789241548434_eng.pdf
123.
The Yogyakarta Principles: The Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity [Internet]. Available from: http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/index.html
124.
Dispatches: Menstruation a Human Rights Issue? Absolutely | Human Rights Watch [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/27/dispatches-menstruation-human-rights-issue-absolutely
125.
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND (Application no. 25579/05) [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-102332
126.
K.L. v. Peru: Final Decision Human Rights Committee views, UN Doc CCPR/C/85/D/1153/2003, 22 November 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://reproductiverights.org/document/kl-v-peru-final-decision
127.
AS v Hungary, decision of the CEDAW Committee, 26th August 2006 Communication No. 4/2004 CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/rossrights/docs/cases/ASHungary.pdf
128.
Alicja TYSIĄC against Poland Application no. 5410/03 Admissibility decision [Internet]. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76165
129.
Tysiac v. Poland: CRR Amicus Brief | Center for Reproductive Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://reproductiverights.org/document/tysiac-v-poland-crr-amicus-brief
130.
Paulina del Carmen Ramírez Jacinto v. Mexico, Case 161-02, Report No. 21/07, Inter-Am. C.H.R., OEA/Ser.L/V/II.130 Doc. 22, rev. 1 (2007) [Internet]. Available from: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/21-07.html
131.
Precautionary and provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Commission and Court to El Salvador in favour of "Beatriz.” see: [Internet]. Available from: http://cejil.org/en/categoria/pais/el-salvador-0
132.
Alyne da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil (Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women): CEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/Jurisprudence/CEDAW-C-49-D-17-2008_en.pdf
133.
Packer, Corinne. Defining and Delineating the Right to Reproductive Choice. Nordic Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1998;67. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nordic67&id=89
134.
Cook, Rebecca J. International Protection of Women’s Reproductive Rights. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 1991;24. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp24&id=657
135.
Mullaly S. Debating Reproductive Rights in Ireland. Human Rights Quarterly. 2005;27(1):78–104.
136.
El Salvador: UN experts urge Government to reconsider current abortion legislation and practice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=13404&
137.
Cook RJ, Dickens BM, Fathalla MF. Reproductive health and human rights: integrating medicine, ethics, and law. Vol. Issues in biomedical ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2003.
138.
Cook, Rebecca J. Duties to Implement Reproductive Rights. Nordic Journal of International Law [Internet]. 1998;67. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nordic67&id=13
139.
Nicaragua Must Provide Medical Treatment to Pregnant Woman with Cancer | CEJIL [Internet]. Available from: http://cejil.org/en/comunicados/nicaragua-must-provide-medical-treatment-pregnant-woman-cancer
140.
The Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa: An Instrument for Advancing Reproductive and Sexual Rights | Center for Reproductive Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://reproductiverights.org/document/the-protocol-on-the-rights-of-women-in-africa-an-instrument-for-advancing-reproductive-and-
141.
Sexual Rights: An IPPF declaration - International Planned Parenthood Federation [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ippf.org/resource/Sexual-Rights-IPPF-declaration
142.
Report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to education A/65/162, 23 July 2010, Vernor Muñoz [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wunrn.com/news/2010/10_10/10_11_10/101110_sr_files/SR%20Education%20Report-Human%20Right%20to%20Sexual%20Education.pdf
143.
UNESCO Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education (December 2009) [Internet]. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001832/183281e.pdf
144.
UN Human Rights Council Resolution 24 September 2014 on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity: [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/HRC/27/L.27/Rev.1
145.
Zampas, Christina. Conscientious Objection to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: International Human Rights Standards and European Law and Practice. European Journal of Health Law [Internet]. 2012;19. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eurjhlb19&id=241&collection=journals&index=journals/eurjhlb
146.
Dispatches: Menstruation a Human Rights Issue? Absolutely | Human Rights Watch [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/27/dispatches-menstruation-human-rights-issue-absolutely
147.
BBC News - The Indian sanitary pad revolutionary [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26260978
148.
Promotion of the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: protecting women human rights defenders A /RES/68/181 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/181
149.
Declaration on Human Rights Defenders [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/SRHRDefenders/Pages/Declaration.aspx
150.
Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Margaret Sekaggya, A/HRC/16/44, Published 20 December 2010 [Internet]. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/16session/A-HRC-16-44.pdf
151.
Our right to safety: Women human rights defenders holistic approach to protection (AWID, 2014) [Internet]. Available from: http://defendingwomen-defendingrights.org/2014/03/11/our-right-to-safety-new-report/
152.
Amnesty International. Challenging repression: human rights defenders in the Middle East and North Africa [Internet]. Available from: http://www.amnesty.org/ar/library/asset/MDE01/001/2009/en/3fe5c240-d77d-4e15-8957-5928387d1093/mde010012009eng.pdf
153.
Miller AM, Roseman MJ. Sexual and reproductive rights at the United Nations: frustration or fulfilment? Reproductive Health Matters [Internet]. 2011 Nov;19(38):102–18. Available from: http://www.rhm-elsevier.com/article/S0968-8080%2811%2938585-0/pdf
154.
CSW58: Statement of the Lesbian, Bisexual, and Trans* Caucus and Allies | IGLHRC: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission [Internet]. Available from: http://iglhrc.org/content/csw58-statement-lesbian-bisexual-and-trans-caucus-and-allies
155.
Africa: End discrimination against LGBTI on international day against homophobia | Amnesty International [Internet]. Available from: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/africa-end-discrimination-against-gays-international-day-against-homophobia-2012-05-16
156.
Stopler, Gila. Countenancing the Oppression of Women: How Liberals Tolerate Religious and Cultural Practices That Discriminate against Women. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law [Internet]. 2003;12. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/coljgl12&id=164
157.
Bennoune, Karima. Secularism and Human Rights: A Contextual Analysis of Headscarves, Religious Expression, and Women’s Equality under International Law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law [Internet]. 2006;45. Available from: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cjtl45&id=373
158.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on all forms of religious intolerance to the General Assembly, UN Doc A/68/290, 7 August 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Religion/A.68.290.pdf
159.
El Salvador: meet the women who dare to challenge the anti-abortion state | Global development | The Guardian [Internet]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/apr/17/beatriz-case-resistance-el-salvador-abortion-law
160.
Claiming rights, claiming justice, Coalition 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wluml.org/sites/wluml.org/files/EN_Claiming_Rights_0.pdf
161.
Global report on the situation of women human rights defenders 2012, [Internet]. Available from: http://defendingwomen-defendingrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/WHRD_IC_Global-Report_2012.pdf
162.
Transforming Pain into Hope, Human Rights Defenders in the Americas | Amnesty International [Internet]. Available from: http://www.amnesty.org/en/campaigns/human-rights-defenders-americas
163.
Rudolf B, Freeman MA, Chinkin CM. The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
164.
Freeman MA, Chinkin CM, Rudolf B, Kroworsch S, Sherrier A, Wittkopp S, et al. The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary [Internet]. Vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
165.
Timmer A. Toward an anti-stereotyping approach for the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review [Internet]. 2011;11(4). Available from: https://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/content/11/4/707.full.pdf
166.
LEGAL STANDARDS RELATED TO GENDER EQUALITY AND WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THE INTER ‐ AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION [Internet]. Available from: https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/women/docs/pdf/REGIONAL%20STANDARDS.pdf
167.
Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers on gender, the judiciary and the administration of justice, UN Doc A/HRC/17/30, 29 April 2011 women in the criminal justice system [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A-HRC-17-30.pdf
168.
United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders, known as the "Bangkok Rules” [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.un.org/Docs/asp/ws.asp?m=A/RES/65/229
169.
Law and Other Things: Ban the two-finger test in rape cases [Internet]. Available from: http://lawandotherthings.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/ban-two-finger-test-in-rape-trials.html
170.
Cook RJ, Cusack SA, Dickens B. Unethical Female Stereotyping in Reproductive Health by Rebecca J. Cook, Simone A. Cusack, Bernard Dickens :: SSRN. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, [Internet]. 2010;109:255–8. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1600859
171.
Center for Reproductive Rights Files Case Revealing the Horrifying Reality of El Salvador’s Ban on Abortion | Center for Reproductive Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://reproductiverights.org/press-room/center-for-reproductive-rights-files-case-revealing-the-horrifying-reality-of-el-salvador
172.
"Adultery as a criminal offence violates women’s human rights” [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=12672&
173.
Engendering Justice from Policy to Practice: Final report of the Commission on Women and the Criminal Justice System [Internet]. Fawcett Society; 2009. Available from: http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Engendering-Justice-from-Policy-to-Practice.pdf
174.
UN General Assembly Resolution 65/228 on access to effective legal assistance for women and girls [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/65/228
175.
In South Africa, Sex Workers Arm Themselves with the Law | Open Society Foundations (OSF) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/south-africa-sex-workers-make-law-work-them
176.
Common Human Rights Violations Experienced by Sex Workers. Public Health Factsheet [Internet]. Open Society Foundations; Available from: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/common-human-rights-violations-experienced-by-sex-workers-english-20110831.pdf
177.
Attempt to criminalise the morning after pill Honduras set to criminalise the morning after pill | Amnesty International [Internet]. Available from: http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/AMR37/005/2012/es/0af50847-c222-4715-856a-9f5deb6696d9/amr370052012en.html
178.
BBC News - El Salvador: Where women may be jailed for miscarrying [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24532694
179.
UN Women [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unwomen.org/en
180.
Commission on the Status of Women | UN Women – Headquarters [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unwomen.org/en/csw
181.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights / OHCHR Welcome page [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Pages/WelcomePage.aspx
182.
ECHR Home [Internet]. Available from: http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
183.
OAS :: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/
184.
OAS :: IACHR :: Rapporteurship on the Rights of Women [Internet]. Available from: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/women/default.asp
185.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/index.php/en
186.
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.achpr.org/
187.
Special Rapporteur on Rights of Women / Special Mechanisms / ACHPR [Internet]. Available from: http://www.achpr.org/mechanisms/rights-of-women/
188.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POPULATION LAW [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/population/annual_review.htm
189.
Women’s Human Rights Resources [Internet]. Available from: http://www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/diana/
190.
Women & Justice Collection [Internet]. Available from: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/womenandjustice/Legal-and-Other-Resources/index.cfm
191.
Women’s rights | Amnesty International [Internet]. Available from: http://www.amnesty.org/en/womens-rights
192.
Women’s rights | Amnesty International [Internet]. Available from: http://www.amnesty.org/en/womens-rights
193.
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON ‘CRIMES OF HONOUR’ [Internet]. Available from: https://www.soas.ac.uk/honourcrimes/bibliography/file54988.pdf
194.
ESCR-Net [Internet]. Available from: http://www.escr-net.org/
195.
The Sisterhood Is Global Institute | The Think Tank of International Feminism [Internet]. Available from: http://sigi.org/
196.
WILPF | Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wilpfinternational.org/
197.
IntLawGrrls [Internet]. Available from: http://ilg2.org/
198.
Association for women’s rights in development - AWID [Internet]. Available from: http://www.awid.org/
199.
Women’s Link Worldwide [Internet]. Available from: http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/wlw/new.php
200.
CREA (feminist leadership, sexual and reproductive rights) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.creaworld.org/
201.
Human Rights Watch | Defending Human Rights Worldwide [Internet]. Available from: http://www.hrw.org/home
202.
Feministing | Young Feminists Blogging, Organizing, Kicking Ass [Internet]. Available from: http://feministing.com/
203.
Upworthy: Things that matter. Pass ’em on. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.upworthy.com/
204.
Baxi P. Public secrets of law: rape trials in India [Internet]. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198089568.001.0001
205.
Flavin J. Our bodies, our crimes: the policing of women’s reproduction in America. Vol. Alternative criminology series. New York: New York University Press; 2009.
206.
Menon N. Seeing like a feminist. New Delhi: Zubaan in collaboration with Penguin Books; 2012.
