[1]
M. A. Freeman et al., The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
[2]
B. Rudolf, M. A. Freeman, and C. M. Chinkin, The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[3]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish, 2005.
[4]
S. D. Ross, Women’s human rights: the international and comparative law casebook, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.
[5]
R. J. Cook, Human rights of women: national and international perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.
[6]
R. J. Cook and ebrary, Inc, Human rights of women: national and international perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10576124
[7]
H. Charlesworth and C. M. Chinkin, The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis, vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.
[8]
R. J. Cook, S. Cusack, and ebrary, Inc, Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10642665
[9]
R. J. Cook and S. Cusack, Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.
[10]
Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright, ‘Feminist Approaches to International Law’, The American Journal of International Law, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 613–645, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/2203269?sid=21105586542853&uid=3738032&uid=2&uid=4
[11]
H. Charlesworth and C. M. Chinkin, ‘Chapters 1, 2 & 5’, in The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis, vol. Melland Schill studies in international law, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.
[12]
Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Not Waving but Drowning: Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations’, Harvard human rights journal, vol. 18, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hhrj18&id=7&collection=journals&index=
[13]
MacKinnon, Catharine A., ‘Engaged Scholarship as Method and Vocation’, Yale journal of law and feminism, vol. 22, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjfem22&div=10&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults&terms=C.|MacKinnon|Engaged|Scholarship|as|a|Method|and|Vocation&type=matchall
[14]
R. Coomarswaamy, ‘Reinventing International Law’. [Online]. Available: http://library.law.columbia.edu/urlmirror/11/ReinventingInternationalLaw.htm
[15]
A. S. Fraser, ‘Becoming Human: The Origins and Development of Women’s Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 853–906, 1999, doi: 10.1353/hrq.1999.0050. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v021/21.4fraser.html
[16]
Charlesworth, Hilary, ‘Hidden Gender of International Law, The’, Temple international and comparative law journal, vol. 16, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tclj16&id=99&collection=journals&index=
[17]
Teson, Fernando R., ‘Feminism and International Law: A Reply’, Virginia journal of international law, vol. 33, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint33&div=34&g_sent=1&collection=journals
[18]
‘Airey v Ireland 32 Eur Ct HR Ser A (1979): [1979] 2 E.H.R.R. 305 | ESCR-Net’. [Online]. Available: http://www.escr-net.org/docs/i/400936
[19]
‘Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of González et al. ("Cotton Field”) v. Mexico Judgment of November 16, 2009 (Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations, and Costs)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_205_ing.pdf
[20]
‘Egyptian Initiative for Personal Rights and Interights v Egypt 323/2006, 14 March 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://eipr.org/sites/default/files/pressreleases/pdf/text_of_the_afriocan_commission_decision-english.pdf
[21]
‘González Carreño v. Spain, CEDAW Communication CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012’. [Online]. Available: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012&Lang=en
[22]
‘Optional Protocol CEDAW’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/OPCEDAW.aspx
[23]
‘Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/Vienna.aspx
[24]
‘UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund | International Conference on Population and Development Programme of Action’. [Online]. Available: http://www.unfpa.org/publications/international-conference-population-and-development-programme-action
[25]
‘Fourth World Conference on Women, Declaration and Program for Action, 15 September 1995, UN Doc A/CONF.177/20/Rev.1’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform/
[26]
‘Human Rights Committee General Comment No 24 on Reservations, date 24th November 1994’. [Online]. Available: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.6&Lang=en
[27]
‘General Comment No. 28 - Article 3 (The equality of rights between men and women)’. [Online]. Available: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.10&Lang=en
[28]
‘Human Rights Committee General Comment No. 31 [80] Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant’. [Online]. Available: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.13&Lang=en
[29]
‘Platform for Action and the Declaration from Beijing + 10’,. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw49/documents.html
[30]
UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund, ‘ICPC and human rights :20 years of advancing reproductive rights through UN treaty bodies and legal reform’. [Online]. Available: http://www.unfpa.org/publications/icpd-and-human-rights
[31]
‘Recurrent and themes and key elements identified during sessions of the Commission on Population and Development: Report of the Secretary-General. UN Doc A/69/122, 15 July 2014’. [Online]. Available: http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1420L9R462P54.2775&profile=bib&uri=link=3100006~!1325851~!3100001~!3100040&aspect=alpha&menu=search&ri=2&source=~!horizon&term=A%2F69%2F122&index=ZUNSYMA#focus
[32]
M. A. Freeman et al., ‘Pages 8-70 and pages 607-659’, in The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
[33]
B. Rudolf, M. A. Freeman, and C. M. Chinkin, ‘Pages 8-70 and pages 607-659 ’, in The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[34]
H. Charlesworth and C. M. Chinkin, ‘Chapters 6 and 7’, in The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis, vol. Melland Schill studies in international law, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.
[35]
Evatt, Elizabeth, ‘Finding a Voice for Women’s Rights: The Early Days of CEDAW’, George Washington International Law Review, vol. 34, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/gwilr34&div=23&g_sent=1&collection=journals
[36]
‘Women, Peace and Security. United Nations Security Council Resolutions, 1325, 1820, 1888, 1960, 2106, 2122’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/issues/women/wps.shtml
[37]
F. N. Aoláin, ‘Women, Security, and the Patriarchy of Internationalized Transitional Justice’, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1055–1085, 2009, doi: 10.1353/hrq.0.0114. [Online]. Available: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/human_rights_quarterly/v031/31.4.aolain.html
[38]
C. Bell and C. O’Rourke, ‘PEACE AGREEMENTS OR PIECES OF PAPER? THE IMPACT OF UNSC RESOLUTION 1325 ON PEACE PROCESSES AND THEIR AGREEMENTS’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 04, pp. 941–980, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1017/S002058931000062X. [Online]. Available: https://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=7923398&fileId=S002058931000062X
[39]
G. Heathcote, ‘Naming and Shaming: Human Rights Accountability in Security Council Resolution 1960 (2010) on Women, Peace and Security’, Journal of Human Rights Practice, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–105, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1093/jhuman/hus003. [Online]. Available: https://jhrp.oxfordjournals.org/content/4/1/82.short
[40]
‘Rape in armed conflict summit’: [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/william-hague-and-angelina-jolie-demand-end-to-impunity-for-warzone-rape
[41]
‘Focus on pages 10-16 skim read the rest’, in International Protocol on the documentation and investigation of sexual violence in conflict, [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/319054/PSVI_protocol_web.pdf
[42]
‘Rape summit in London sparks charge of “hypocrisy” | Global development | The Guardian’. [Online]. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/jun/07/end-sexual-violence-summit-uk-government-hypocrisy
[43]
C. on E. United Nations Social and Cultural Rights, ‘General comment No. 16: The equal right of men and women to the enjoyment of all economic, social and cultural rights (art. 3 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights)’. [Online]. Available: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=E%2fC.12%2f2005%2f4&Lang=en
[44]
UNDP, ‘The future we want : rights and empowerment. Gender equality strategy 2014-2017’. [Online]. Available: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/gender/GenderEqualityStrategy2014-17.pdf
[45]
‘Outcome Document of Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals, 19 July 2014’,. [Online]. Available: http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?menu=1528
[46]
‘Doughnut | Kate Raworth Explore for another approach to integrating human rights in a contemporary and forward-looking development paradigm.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.kateraworth.com/doughnut/
[47]
UNFPA - United Nations Population Fund, ‘ICPC and human rights :20 years of advancing reproductive rights through UN treaty bodies and legal reform’. [Online]. Available: http://www.unfpa.org/publications/icpd-and-human-rights
[48]
‘Recurrent and themes and key elements identified during sessions of the Commission on Population and Development: Report of the Secretary-General. UN Doc A/69/122, 15 July 2014’. [Online]. Available: http://unbisnet.un.org:8080/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1420L9R462P54.2775&profile=bib&uri=link=3100006~!1325851~!3100001~!3100040&aspect=alpha&menu=search&ri=2&source=~!horizon&term=A%2F69%2F122&index=ZUNSYMA#focus
[49]
‘General Comment No. 28 - Article 3 (The equality of rights between men and women)’. [Online]. Available: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2fC%2f21%2fRev.1%2fAdd.10&Lang=en
[50]
M. A. Freeman et al., ‘Pages 71-121 and 197-221’, in The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
[51]
B. Rudolf, M. A. Freeman, and C. M. Chinkin, ‘Pages 71-121 and 197-221’, in The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[52]
R. J. Cook and S. Cusack, ‘Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 6’, in Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010.
[53]
R. J. Cook, S. Cusack, and ebrary, Inc, ‘Chapters 1, 2, 3 and 6 ’, in Gender stereotyping: transnational legal perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10642665
[54]
Aileen McColgan, ‘Principles of equality and protection from discrimination in international human rights law’, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 2, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IB6A64D21E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=reset&entityID=https%3A%2F%2Fidp0.essex.ac.uk%2Fshibboleth+
[55]
S. Joseph and M. Castan, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: cases, materials, and commentary, 3rd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[56]
K. Mahoney, ‘Canadian Approaches to Equality Rights and Gender Equity in the Courts’, in Human rights of women: national and international perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/universityofessex/Doc?id=10576124
[57]
K. Mahoney, ‘Canadian Approaches to Equality Rights and Gender Equity in the Courts’, in Human rights of women: national and international perspectives, vol. Pennsylvania studies in human rights, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1994.
[58]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, ‘Andrews v Law Society of British Columbia, Supreme Court of Canada, Judgement of 2nd Feb 1989’, in Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases, London: Cavendish, 2005.
[59]
‘Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143, 1989 CanLII 2 (SCC)’. [Online]. Available: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1989/1989canlii2/1989canlii2.html
[60]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, ‘Brooks and others v Canada Safeway Limited, Supreme Court of Canada, Judgement of 4th May 1989’, in Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases, London: Cavendish, 2005.
[61]
‘Brooks v. Canada safeway ltd., [1989] 1 SCR 1219, 1989 CanLII 96 (SCC)’. [Online]. Available: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1989/1989canlii96/1989canlii96.html
[62]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, ‘H v E, Equal Opportunities Tribunal, New Zealand’, in Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases, London: Cavendish, 2005.
[63]
‘Student Representative Council of Molepolole College of Education v Attorney General - [1995] 3 LRC 447’ [Online]. Available: https://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=531V-8V31-DYJ0-822W&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[64]
‘Lovelace v Canada decision of the UN Human Rights Committee’. [Online]. Available: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/undocs/session36/6-24.htm
[65]
‘A. P. Johannes Vos v. The Netherlands, Communication No. 786/1997, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/66/D/786/1997 (29 July 1999).’ [Online]. Available: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/undocs/session66/view786.htm
[66]
‘CASE OF WESSELS-BERGERVOET v. THE NETHERLANDS’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-60493
[67]
‘ROCHES v WADE | Commonwealth and International Law Document | INTERIGHTS’. [Online]. Available: http://www.interights.org/commonwealth-and-international-law-document/3047/index.html
[68]
‘Lesotho: Ts’epe v The Independent Electoral Commission and Others (2005) AHRLR 136 (LeCA 2005)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.chr.up.ac.za/index.php/browse-by-subject/343-lesotho-tsepe-v-the-independent-electoral-commission-and-others-2005-ahrlr-136-leca-2005-.pdf
[69]
E. Commission, ‘Strategy for equality between women and men 2010-2015 COM(2010) 491 final’. [Online]. Available: http://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/Strategy-for-equality-between-women-and-men-European-Commision.pdf
[70]
‘Inter- American Court Of Human Rights Case Of Atala Riffo And Daughters V. Chile (Merits, reparation and costs)’. Feb. 24, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_239_ing.pdf
[71]
B. Rudolf, M. A. Freeman, and C. M. Chinkin, The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[72]
M. A. Freeman et al., The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
[73]
‘Magaya v Magaya [1999] ICHRL 14 (16 February 1999)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.worldlii.org/int/cases/ICHRL/1999/14.html
[74]
‘Bhe and Others v The Magistrate, Khayelitsha and Others, Constitutional Court of South Africa, Decision of 15th October 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2004/17media.pdf
[75]
‘Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa (CCT 03/07) [2008] ZACC 9; 2008 (9) BCLR 914 (CC); 2009 (2) SA 66 (CC) (4 June 2008)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2008/9.html
[76]
‘Aumeeruddy v Mauritius, decision of the UN Human Rights Committee’, Human rights law journal, vol. 2, 1981.
[77]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases. London: Cavendish, 2005.
[78]
‘Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors on 23 April, 1985’. [Online]. Available: http://indiankanoon.org/doc/823221/
[79]
‘CASE OF ABDULAZIZ, CABALES AND BALKANDALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57416
[80]
‘CASE OF ÜNAL TEKELI v. TURKEY’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-67482
[81]
‘Hadijatou Mani v Niger | INTERIGHTS’. [Online]. Available: http://www.interights.org/niger-slavery/index.html
[82]
M. A. Freeman et al., The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
[83]
B. Rudolf, M. A. Freeman, and C. M. Chinkin, The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[84]
R. Rubio-Marâin, The gender of reparations: unsettling sexual hierarchies while redressing human rights violations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[85]
R. Rubio-Marâin and EBSCOhost ebook collection, The gender of reparations: unsettling sexual hierarchies while redressing human rights violations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=286494
[86]
R. Rubio-Marâin and EBSCOhost ebook collection, The gender of reparations: unsettling sexual hierarchies while redressing human rights violations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=286494
[87]
Vesa, Andreea, ‘International and Regional Standards for Protecting Victims of Domestic Violence’, American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law, vol. 12, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajgsp12&id=317
[88]
Burton, Mandy, ‘Human Rights of Victims of Domestic Violence: Opuz v Turkey, The’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 22, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq22&id=133
[89]
Hasselbacher, Lee, ‘State Obligations regarding Domestic Violence: The European Court of Human Rights, Due Diligence, and International Legal Minimums of Protection’, Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, vol. 8, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jihr8&id=191
[90]
Edwards, Alice, ‘Violence against Women as Sex Discrimination: Judging the Jurisprudence of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies’, Texas Journal of Women and the Law, vol. 18, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/tjwl18&g_sent=1&id=3
[91]
Simmons, William Paul, ‘Remedies for the Women of Cuidad Juarez through the Inter-American Court of Human Rights’, Northwestern University Journal of International Human Rights, vol. 4, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jihr4&g_sent=1&id=499
[92]
F. Banda and EBSCOhost ebook collection, Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=216333
[93]
F. Banda and dawsonera, Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847311832
[94]
F. Banda, Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart, 2005.
[95]
‘Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Velásquez-Rodríguez v. Honduras Judgment of July 29, 1988 (Merits)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_04_ing.pdf
[96]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, ‘R v R (Rape; Marital Exemption) decision of the House of Lords, 23rd October 1991’, in Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases, London: Cavendish, 2005.
[97]
‘R v R [1990] UKHL 9 (23 October 1991)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1990/9.html
[98]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, ‘Mejia v Peru, Decision of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights’, in Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases, London: Cavendish, 2005.
[99]
‘Mejia v Peru, Decision of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights REPORT No 5/96 CASE 10.970 PERU March 1, 1996’. [Online]. Available: http://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/95eng/Peru10970.htm
[100]
R. Emerton, Commonwealth Secretariat, and University of Hong Kong, ‘Fernandes v Brazil, Decision of the Inter American Commission on Human Rights, 16th April 2001’, in Women’s human rights: leading international and national cases, London: Cavendish, 2005.
[101]
‘MARIA DA PENHA MAIA FERNANDES V BRAZIL REPORT No 54/01* CASE 12.051 April 16, 2001’. [Online]. Available: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/54-01.html
[102]
CEDAW, ‘AT v Hungary Communication No.: 2/2003 (Views adopted on 26 January 2005, thirty-second session’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/protocol/decisions-views/CEDAW%20Decision%20on%20AT%20vs%20Hungary%20English.pdf
[103]
‘CASE OF OPUZ v. TURKEY (Application no. 33401/02)’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-92945
[104]
‘Opuz v Turkey Brief | Legal Resource | INTERIGHTS’. [Online]. Available: http://www.interights.org/document/124/index.html
[105]
‘Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of González et al.("Cotton Field”) v.Mexico Judgment of November 16, 2009 (Preliminary Objection, Merits , Reparations, and Costs)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_205_ing.pdf
[106]
‘Petition 1490-05 - Jessica Gonzales et al. v United States’. [Online]. Available: http://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/2007eng/USA1490.05eng.htm
[107]
‘CASE OF X AND Y v. THE NETHERLANDS (Application no. 8978/80)’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57603
[108]
‘CASE OF M.C. v. BULGARIA (Application no. 39272/98)’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61521
[109]
‘CASE OF AYDIN v. TURKEY (57/1996/676/866)’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-58371
[110]
‘Rosendo Cantu et al vs Mexico’. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_216_ing.pdf
[111]
K. Grewal, ‘The Protection of Sexual Autonomy under International Criminal Law: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Defining Rape’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 373–396, May 2012, doi: 10.1093/jicj/mqs012. [Online]. Available: https://jicj.oxfordjournals.org/content/10/2/373
[112]
‘WHO | Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women’. [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241548595/en/
[113]
‘How To Guide For Interviewing Survivors of Sexual and Gender-Based Violence - WITNESS BlogWITNESS Blog’. [Online]. Available: http://blog.witness.org/2013/08/new-how-to-guide-for-interviewing-survivors-of-sexual-and-gender-based-violence/
[114]
‘WHO | WHO ethical and safety recommendations for researching, documenting and monitoring sexual violence in emergencies’. [Online]. Available: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/9789241595681/en/
[115]
S. McCrum and L. Hughes, ‘Interviewing children a guide for journalists and others (Save the Children)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/INTERVIEWING_CHILDREN.pdf
[116]
M. A. Freeman et al., The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
[117]
B. Rudolf, M. A. Freeman, and C. M. Chinkin, The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[118]
F. Banda, Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart, 2005.
[119]
F. Banda and dawsonera, Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847311832
[120]
F. Banda and EBSCOhost ebook collection, Women, law and human rights: an African perspective. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=216333
[121]
D. Shaw and R. J. Cook, ‘Applying human rights to improve access to reproductive health services’, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 119, pp. S55–S59, 2012.
[122]
WHO, ‘Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems’. [Online]. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/70914/1/9789241548434_eng.pdf
[123]
‘The Yogyakarta Principles: The Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity’. [Online]. Available: http://www.yogyakartaprinciples.org/index.html
[124]
‘Dispatches: Menstruation a Human Rights Issue? Absolutely | Human Rights Watch’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/27/dispatches-menstruation-human-rights-issue-absolutely
[125]
‘CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND (Application no. 25579/05)’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-102332
[126]
‘K.L. v. Peru: Final Decision Human Rights Committee views, UN Doc CCPR/C/85/D/1153/2003, 22 November 2005’. [Online]. Available: http://reproductiverights.org/document/kl-v-peru-final-decision
[127]
‘AS v Hungary, decision of the CEDAW Committee, 26th August 2006 Communication No. 4/2004 CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004’. [Online]. Available: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/rossrights/docs/cases/ASHungary.pdf
[128]
‘Alicja TYSIĄC against Poland Application no. 5410/03 Admissibility decision’. [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76165
[129]
‘Tysiac v. Poland: CRR Amicus Brief | Center for Reproductive Rights’. [Online]. Available: http://reproductiverights.org/document/tysiac-v-poland-crr-amicus-brief
[130]
‘Paulina del Carmen Ramírez Jacinto v. Mexico, Case 161-02, Report No. 21/07, Inter-Am. C.H.R., OEA/Ser.L/V/II.130 Doc. 22, rev. 1 (2007)’. [Online]. Available: http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/21-07.html
[131]
‘Precautionary and provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Commission and Court to El Salvador in favour of "Beatriz.” see:’ [Online]. Available: http://cejil.org/en/categoria/pais/el-salvador-0
[132]
‘Alyne da Silva Pimentel v. Brazil (Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women): CEDAW/C/49/D/17/2008’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/CEDAW/Jurisprudence/CEDAW-C-49-D-17-2008_en.pdf
[133]
Packer, Corinne, ‘Defining and Delineating the Right to Reproductive Choice’, Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 67, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nordic67&id=89
[134]
Cook, Rebecca J., ‘International Protection of Women’s Reproductive Rights’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 24, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp24&id=657
[135]
S. Mullaly, ‘Debating Reproductive Rights in Ireland’, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 78–104, 2005, doi: 10.1353/hrq.2005.0008.
[136]
‘El Salvador: UN experts urge Government to reconsider current abortion legislation and practice’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=13404&
[137]
R. J. Cook, B. M. Dickens, and M. F. Fathalla, Reproductive health and human rights: integrating medicine, ethics, and law, vol. Issues in biomedical ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
[138]
Cook, Rebecca J., ‘Duties to Implement Reproductive Rights’, Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 67, 1998 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nordic67&id=13
[139]
‘Nicaragua Must Provide Medical Treatment to Pregnant Woman with Cancer | CEJIL’. [Online]. Available: http://cejil.org/en/comunicados/nicaragua-must-provide-medical-treatment-pregnant-woman-cancer
[140]
‘The Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa: An Instrument for Advancing Reproductive and Sexual Rights | Center for Reproductive Rights’. [Online]. Available: http://reproductiverights.org/document/the-protocol-on-the-rights-of-women-in-africa-an-instrument-for-advancing-reproductive-and-
[141]
‘Sexual Rights: An IPPF declaration - International Planned Parenthood Federation’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ippf.org/resource/Sexual-Rights-IPPF-declaration
[142]
‘Report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the right to education A/65/162, 23 July 2010, Vernor Muñoz’. [Online]. Available: http://www.wunrn.com/news/2010/10_10/10_11_10/101110_sr_files/SR%20Education%20Report-Human%20Right%20to%20Sexual%20Education.pdf
[143]
‘UNESCO Technical Guidance on Sexuality Education (December 2009)’. [Online]. Available: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001832/183281e.pdf
[144]
‘UN Human Rights Council Resolution 24 September 2014 on human rights, sexual orientation and gender identity’: [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/HRC/27/L.27/Rev.1
[145]
Zampas, Christina, ‘Conscientious Objection to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: International Human Rights Standards and European Law and Practice’, European Journal of Health Law, vol. 19, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eurjhlb19&id=241&collection=journals&index=journals/eurjhlb
[146]
‘Dispatches: Menstruation a Human Rights Issue? Absolutely | Human Rights Watch’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/05/27/dispatches-menstruation-human-rights-issue-absolutely
[147]
‘BBC News - The Indian sanitary pad revolutionary’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-26260978
[148]
‘Promotion of the Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: protecting women human rights defenders A /RES/68/181’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/68/181
[149]
‘Declaration on Human Rights Defenders’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/SRHRDefenders/Pages/Declaration.aspx
[150]
‘Report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Margaret Sekaggya, A/HRC/16/44, Published 20 December 2010’. [Online]. Available: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/16session/A-HRC-16-44.pdf
[151]
‘Our right to safety: Women human rights defenders holistic approach to protection (AWID, 2014)’. [Online]. Available: http://defendingwomen-defendingrights.org/2014/03/11/our-right-to-safety-new-report/
[152]
Amnesty International, ‘Challenging repression: human rights defenders in the Middle East and North Africa’. [Online]. Available: http://www.amnesty.org/ar/library/asset/MDE01/001/2009/en/3fe5c240-d77d-4e15-8957-5928387d1093/mde010012009eng.pdf
[153]
A. M. Miller and M. J. Roseman, ‘Sexual and reproductive rights at the United Nations: frustration or fulfilment?’, Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 19, no. 38, pp. 102–118, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)38585-0. [Online]. Available: http://www.rhm-elsevier.com/article/S0968-8080%2811%2938585-0/pdf
[154]
‘CSW58: Statement of the Lesbian, Bisexual, and Trans* Caucus and Allies | IGLHRC: International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission’. [Online]. Available: http://iglhrc.org/content/csw58-statement-lesbian-bisexual-and-trans-caucus-and-allies
[155]
‘Africa: End discrimination against LGBTI on international day against homophobia | Amnesty International’. [Online]. Available: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news/africa-end-discrimination-against-gays-international-day-against-homophobia-2012-05-16
[156]
Stopler, Gila, ‘Countenancing the Oppression of Women: How Liberals Tolerate Religious and Cultural Practices That Discriminate against Women’, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, vol. 12, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/coljgl12&id=164
[157]
Bennoune, Karima, ‘Secularism and Human Rights: A Contextual Analysis of Headscarves, Religious Expression, and Women’s Equality under International Law’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, vol. 45, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/cjtl45&id=373
[158]
‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on all forms of religious intolerance to the General Assembly, UN Doc A/68/290, 7 August 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Religion/A.68.290.pdf
[159]
‘El Salvador: meet the women who dare to challenge the anti-abortion state | Global development | The Guardian’. [Online]. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2014/apr/17/beatriz-case-resistance-el-salvador-abortion-law
[160]
‘Claiming rights, claiming justice, Coalition 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://www.wluml.org/sites/wluml.org/files/EN_Claiming_Rights_0.pdf
[161]
‘Global report on the situation of women human rights defenders 2012’,. [Online]. Available: http://defendingwomen-defendingrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/WHRD_IC_Global-Report_2012.pdf
[162]
‘Transforming Pain into Hope, Human Rights Defenders in the Americas | Amnesty International’. [Online]. Available: http://www.amnesty.org/en/campaigns/human-rights-defenders-americas
[163]
B. Rudolf, M. A. Freeman, and C. M. Chinkin, The UN Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
[164]
M. A. Freeman et al., The UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women: a commentary, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp0.essex.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780191630088
[165]
A. Timmer, ‘Toward an anti-stereotyping approach for the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Law Review, vol. 11, no. 4, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://hrlr.oxfordjournals.org/content/11/4/707.full.pdf
[166]
‘LEGAL STANDARDS RELATED TO GENDER EQUALITY AND WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THE INTER ‐ AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM: DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION’. [Online]. Available: https://www.oas.org/en/iachr/women/docs/pdf/REGIONAL%20STANDARDS.pdf
[167]
‘Report of the Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers on gender, the judiciary and the administration of justice, UN Doc A/HRC/17/30, 29 April 2011 women in the criminal justice system’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/17session/A-HRC-17-30.pdf
[168]
‘United Nations Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders, known as the "Bangkok Rules”’. Mar. 16, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/Docs/asp/ws.asp?m=A/RES/65/229
[169]
‘Law and Other Things: Ban the two-finger test in rape cases’. [Online]. Available: http://lawandotherthings.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/ban-two-finger-test-in-rape-trials.html
[170]
R. J. Cook, S. A. Cusack, and B. Dickens, ‘Unethical Female Stereotyping in Reproductive Health by Rebecca J. Cook, Simone A. Cusack, Bernard Dickens :: SSRN’, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 109, pp. 255–258, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1600859
[171]
‘Center for Reproductive Rights Files Case Revealing the Horrifying Reality of El Salvador’s Ban on Abortion | Center for Reproductive Rights’. [Online]. Available: http://reproductiverights.org/press-room/center-for-reproductive-rights-files-case-revealing-the-horrifying-reality-of-el-salvador
[172]
‘"Adultery as a criminal offence violates women’s human rights”’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=12672&
[173]
‘Engendering Justice from Policy to Practice: Final report of the Commission on Women and the Criminal Justice System’. Fawcett Society, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.fawcettsociety.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Engendering-Justice-from-Policy-to-Practice.pdf
[174]
‘UN General Assembly Resolution 65/228 on access to effective legal assistance for women and girls’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/65/228
[175]
‘In South Africa, Sex Workers Arm Themselves with the Law | Open Society Foundations (OSF)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/south-africa-sex-workers-make-law-work-them
[176]
‘Common Human Rights Violations Experienced by Sex Workers. Public Health Factsheet’. Open Society Foundations [Online]. Available: http://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/common-human-rights-violations-experienced-by-sex-workers-english-20110831.pdf
[177]
‘Attempt to criminalise the morning after pill Honduras set to criminalise the morning after pill | Amnesty International’. [Online]. Available: http://www.amnesty.org/es/library/asset/AMR37/005/2012/es/0af50847-c222-4715-856a-9f5deb6696d9/amr370052012en.html
[178]
‘BBC News - El Salvador: Where women may be jailed for miscarrying’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24532694
[179]
‘UN Women’. [Online]. Available: http://www.unwomen.org/en
[180]
‘Commission on the Status of Women | UN Women – Headquarters’. [Online]. Available: http://www.unwomen.org/en/csw
[181]
‘Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights / OHCHR Welcome page’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Pages/WelcomePage.aspx
[182]
‘ECHR Home’. [Online]. Available: http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home
[183]
‘OAS :: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights’. [Online]. Available: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/
[184]
‘OAS :: IACHR :: Rapporteurship on the Rights of Women’. [Online]. Available: http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/women/default.asp
[185]
‘Inter-American Court of Human Rights’. [Online]. Available: http://www.corteidh.or.cr/index.php/en
[186]
‘African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights’. [Online]. Available: http://www.achpr.org/
[187]
‘Special Rapporteur on Rights of Women / Special Mechanisms / ACHPR’. [Online]. Available: http://www.achpr.org/mechanisms/rights-of-women/
[188]
‘ANNUAL REVIEW OF POPULATION LAW’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/population/annual_review.htm
[189]
‘Women’s Human Rights Resources’. [Online]. Available: http://www.law-lib.utoronto.ca/diana/
[190]
‘Women & Justice Collection’. [Online]. Available: http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/womenandjustice/Legal-and-Other-Resources/index.cfm
[191]
‘Women’s rights | Amnesty International’. [Online]. Available: http://www.amnesty.org/en/womens-rights
[192]
‘Women’s rights | Amnesty International’. [Online]. Available: http://www.amnesty.org/en/womens-rights
[193]
‘ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ON ‘CRIMES OF HONOUR’’. [Online]. Available: https://www.soas.ac.uk/honourcrimes/bibliography/file54988.pdf
[194]
‘ESCR-Net’. [Online]. Available: http://www.escr-net.org/
[195]
‘The Sisterhood Is Global Institute | The Think Tank of International Feminism’. [Online]. Available: http://sigi.org/
[196]
‘WILPF | Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom’. [Online]. Available: http://www.wilpfinternational.org/
[197]
‘IntLawGrrls’. [Online]. Available: http://ilg2.org/
[198]
‘Association for women’s rights in development - AWID’. [Online]. Available: http://www.awid.org/
[199]
‘Women’s Link Worldwide’. [Online]. Available: http://www.womenslinkworldwide.org/wlw/new.php
[200]
‘CREA (feminist leadership, sexual and reproductive rights)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.creaworld.org/
[201]
‘Human Rights Watch | Defending Human Rights Worldwide’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hrw.org/home
[202]
‘Feministing | Young Feminists Blogging, Organizing, Kicking Ass’. [Online]. Available: http://feministing.com/
[203]
‘Upworthy: Things that matter. Pass ’em on.’ [Online]. Available: http://www.upworthy.com/
[204]
P. Baxi, Public secrets of law: rape trials in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198089568.001.0001
[205]
J. Flavin, Our bodies, our crimes: the policing of women’s reproduction in America, vol. Alternative criminology series. New York: New York University Press, 2009.
[206]
N. Menon, Seeing like a feminist. New Delhi: Zubaan in collaboration with Penguin Books, 2012.
